站内公告:

亲友传真---海外信息直接看 https://qycz.org

Main Menu

回覆帖子

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
限制: 每篇帖子 3 (3 remaining), maximum total size 8.00 MB, maximum individual size 2.00 MB
请将要删除的附件取消勾选
Click or drag files here to attach them.
进阶选项(包含帖子状态和附件)...
验证码:
请将此框留空:
《九评共产党》一共有几评?(请用阿拉伯数字回答):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

帖子总览

作者 Mahan
 - 一月 27, 2026, 12:08:58 下午
Hello,

In these challenging times with filtering and instability of Iran's internet, where most protocols, or rather almost all of them, have stopped working, Freegate, although slow, still establishes a stable connection. The requests that Freegate sends to the DNS server are such that most of them get blocked due to the long domain names. I manually allowed this type of request on my server where I cached the DNS, but Iran's filtering is getting more severe day by day. Tuic and Shadowsocks 2022 work well at certain hours, although they are unstable. Interestingly, other protocols work for a few seconds and just for a Google request, but then they get blocked quickly. However, Freegate still manages to survive in these conditions.

I request that you increase the number of servers and nodes. Speed is not very important in these circumstances, stability is. Iran's filtering infrastructure only accepts external requests via HTTP, and most of the connections that are not whitelisted are marked as 'connection insecure.' But Freegate can establish a secure connection. However, CAPTCHAs on websites are annoying and solving them is difficult. Psiphon works recently, but like Freegate, it doesn't have a stable connection.